Showing posts with label The Jack Sack. Show all posts
Showing posts with label The Jack Sack. Show all posts

The LAMB Devours the Oscars - Best Picture: Inglourious Basterds

Editor's note: Welcome to the thirtieth of a 33-part series dissecting the 82st Academy Awards, brought to you by the Large Association of Movie Blogs and its assorted members. Every day leading up to the Oscars, a new post written by a different LAMB will be published, each covering a different category of the Oscars. To read any other posts regarding this event, please click the tag following the post. Thank you, and enjoy!










By Adam Cohen of The Jack Sack.

Quentin Tarantino deals in basic human emotions, and that's why his films connect so readily with audiences. One of Tarantino's favorite themes is revenge- most notably told on an operatic scale with "Kill Bill" parts 1 & 2. Revenge is where he returns for "Inglorious Basterds," which is set amidst one of history's greatest crime scenes- The Third Reich. One could argue that making a revenge flick about killing Nazis is kind of a cheat- who wouldn't want to kill some Nazis? Well, that may be true, but Tarantino doesn't go after the Germans, he obliterates them in the most creative ways imaginable. So, on a very basic emotional level, "Basterds" is exactly what it says it is- a movie about killing Nazis. But that alone shouldn't get you a Best Picture nomination. And to that end, there's a lot more to this film than offing brownshirts.

When the film opens, it presents its best character, Best Supporting Actor nominee Christoph Waltz as Colonel Hans Landa of the SS. Landa is the film's main villain- the embodiment of all that is evil in Germany. He hangs over all that takes place for the rest of the movie- from Shoshanna, the sole survivor of a family of Jews hiding underneath the farmhouse (that Landa and his team kill in the film's violent opening scene) to the later showdown between him and Lt. Aldo Raines- who recruits the titular "Basterds" that are dropped into occupied France to kill Nazis. The film is set up and executed brilliantly by Tarantino's sure hand. Nothing in this movie is wasted. No character lacks life- even ones who are more comical than dramatic (the "Bear Jew") are indelible screen presences.


So, what has the Academy so excited about this "pulp historical fiction?" For one, it's a movie about movies- Shoshanna has fled the French country to Paris, where she becomes the proprietor of a quaint cinema. She is a cinephile, as are many other characters in this film. And the love of film displayed in "Basterds" is an odd but appropriate common thread. German cinema preceding the Third Reich was experimental and groundbreaking. Fritz Lang, Germany's most famous director, was squired by Nazi propaganda chief Joseph Goebbels early in Hitler's rule. Lang, like many others, later fled Germany for the West when it was clear that anyone remaining would have to cooperate with Nazi ideology. Leni Reifenstahl remained and became Hitler's most famous and accomplished propagandist filmmaker. No doubt all of these auteurs, and many more were included in British Lt. Archie Hicox's writing for "Films and Filmmakers" (I love everything about Hicox's scene with a silent Winston Churchill).

And "Basterd's" climax exists in Shoshanna's movie house- which I won't ruin for anyone who has yet to see this film. But where fantasy branches from reality, it is wholly befitting that the most ridiculous events occur in this setting. Some may criticize "Basterds" for making some very major departures from actual history. But Tarantino didn't come to this subject to film a "Saving Private Ryan." He purposely plowed through the restrictions a conventional movie might hold itself to and decided "I'm going to let this beast loose." His choice works because he did so with a purpose- to cause the audience to become engulfed in the chaos that exists in a state of war.


I would equate "Basterds" to Tarantino's other most-acclaimed film, "Pulp Fiction" in that it seeks to rip down the barriers that make 99.9% of films safe and predictable. Tarantino wants you to shift in your seat and peek through the fingers covering your eyes. He, like Alfred Hitchcock, embraces the darkest parts of human psychology, and he does so in several brilliantly acted and directed scenes. From the opening farm house massacre, to the most terrifying chat about German pastries ever, and to a gut-wrenching sequence in a lazy pub riddled with drunk German revelers, "Basterds" is a sneaky creation- it's a horror movie, but it's covered in a war movie genre wrapping.

While other films in the Best Picture Category have legitimate claims to the golden statue, "Inglorious Basterds" is the most pure example of movie making among the bunch. It doesn't rely on CGI trickery, nor does it play to safe emotions like finding redemption, etc. Instead, Tarantino uses the film medium to pay a tribute to something old but does so with a modern awareness. I believe its chances of winning Best Picture are strong.

The LAMB Devours the Oscars - Best Sound Mixing

Editor's note: Welcome to the eleventh of a 24-part series dissecting the 81st Academy Awards, brought to you by the Large Association of Movie Blogs and its assorted members. Every day leading up to the Oscars, a new post written by a different LAMB will be published, each covering a different category of the Oscars. To read any other posts regarding this event, please click the tag following the post. Thank you, and enjoy!









By Adam from The Jack Sack

The Academy Award for Best Achievement in Sound is given for the motion picture having the best mix of the multitude of elements that make up a film's audio. These components generally include dialogue, music, sound effects and atmospheric noise (not to be discounted would be the subliminal messages James Cameron inserted into TITANIC that convinced people to keep seeing his picture). It's not a sexy category, for certain, but without sound a movie would lose its soul. And without the right overall balance of audio elements, a movie would lose its character. Here are the nominees and my take:

THE CURIOUS CASE OF BENJAMIN BUTTON – David Parker, Michael Semanick, Ren Klyce and Mark Weingarten

Regular readers of The Jack Sack know that I loathed this movie. But that's not to say that its technical qualities were not outstanding. BUTTON failed dramatically but it certainly deserves recognition for its sound mix. It's audio is traditional big-Hollywood- with a heavy reliance on its sweeping score. There are some scenes, particularly the ambush with the Nazi sub, that are fully engrossing. There is nothing wrong per se with BUTTON's audio, but perhaps my bias against the movie makes me less enthusiastic about its merit.

THE DARK KNIGHT– Lora Hirschberg, Gary Rizzo and Ed Novick

Here we... go! KNIGHT's audio left a very large impression on me. Certainly this film benefits from its diverse mix of action and drama, along with the fantastic exploits if its billionaire vigilante, Batman. But the sound is so distinct that it really contributed to the "urban-industrial opera" taking place. Where there was tension, the film's sound delivered high-pitches and rumbling fear perfectly. And where there was tragedy, these emotions were delivered not with sweeping orchestral movements, but with absolutely no audio whatsoever (as was the case when Harvey Dent learned of Rachel Dawes' death). Christopher Nolan's Batman films have defied the superhero genre in all aspects, and sound is chief among those categories. I'll be rooting for this to win.

SLUMDOG MILLIONAIRE – Ian Tapp, Richard Pryke and Resul Pookutty

Danny Boyle's masterpiece depicting the struggle of three youths in the slums of India benefits tremendously from a perfectly-designed audio track. This brutal fable of love and survival could have been dragged down by generic sound mixing. But Danny Boyle is... well pretty awesome, and his team of sound mixers and re-mixers did everything right. Some scenes are haunting (like the bloodshed that claimed a village early on) and others are completely euphoric (where Jamal, the protagonist, finally achieves "freedom" from his demons). The sound in these scenes and others was essential to building the film's wide range of emotions. But not for THE DARK KNIGHT's operatic sound mix, I would choose SLUMDOG as the most worthy nominee.

WALL*E – Tom Myers, Michael Semanick and Ben Burtt

This film relies on its audio more than any other one nominated in this category. WALL*E's non-human characters express themselves primarily through their unique sounds. In order for this film to be bearable, let alone wonderful, the sound design needed to be perfect. No pressure, eh Ben Burtt? Well the audio team succeeded tremendously, and this film deserves to win the Best Sound Editing Oscar. But the category we're discussing goes beyond the design of the sound and encompasses the entirety of the film's audio. You can't say anything negative about this film's technical achievements. I wouldn't be surprised if this film wins the category either. I just have a huge crush for that Batman flick... alright, I'll stop gushing.

WANTED – Chris Jenkins, Frank A. MontaƱo and Petr Forejt

Director Timur Bekmambeto makes obnoxious movies. Some people like this kind of cinema (I admit that I've seen THE ROCK a good dozen times). But WANTED is something devoid of any charm- it's an idiotic film through and through. I cannot render an opinion on its audio mix because I was unable to hear anything over my own grumbles and groans. To be fair, I honestly didn't pay close attention to the sound. It could be good, maybe even great, but ultimately sound exists within the context of the whole motion picture. And unless the sound team muted the dialogue completely, I cannot give them any credit towards making this film "good."

Bottom line prediction: WALL*E will probably win, but put my vote down for THE DARK KNIGHT.

LAMB #228 - The Jack Sack


















URL: http://thejacksack.com/
Site Name: The Jack Sack
Categories: Entertainment/humor blog geared towards Jack Bauer, "24" and cinema in general.
Rating: If I had to rate my site, I would say it is a PG-13 at worst. I don't use foul language often, I am sensitive to people's tastes in that respect. At the same time, I write about adult things, so PG-13 it is.

What is the main focus of your site?
The TV Show "24" and discussing film in general.

What are your blogging goals, personally and/or professionally? In other words, what, if anything, are you trying to get out your blog?
I want to add my voice to the conversation about film. Additionally, I want to bring humor to fans of "24."

Do you prefer an interactive 'community' for your blog or are you the teacher and your readers are the students?
I like to interact with readers.

How long have you been movie blogging for, and how frequent do you post updates to your site?
I've been blogging regularly for a couple of years. I post at least once a week.

Name up to three of your favorite movies (and no more).
Lawrence of Arabia, Children of Men and Star Wars.

How did you hear about the LAMB?
I found LAMB searching Google randomly.

Any additional comments, or give yourself an interview question that's not listed above.
I want to connect with more bloggers, I hope that LAMB is the opportunity to allow this to happen.

Thank you for reading through this application.