Showing posts with label Marshall and the Movies. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Marshall and the Movies. Show all posts

LAMBcast #52: 2011 Academy Award Predictions

It's Nostraoscar time! Dylan, James, Nick, Tom and Marshall get our predicting hats on, as we try to guess who the nominess and winners will be for Best Picture, Director, and all of the Acting categories. One of us is bound to be right! BONUS: Hear Jason's fantastic promo he made for the LAMBcast, to be aired on his podcast, The Lair of the Unwanted (it's so good, I just had to play it here!).

Also on tap:

* Listener Feedback
* LAMB of the Week
* Trailer Talk: Hanna
* Last LAMB Standing

Music by Kevin MacLeod (http://incompetech.com).

For the LAMB of the Week, we take a look at LAMB #410, Big Thoughts From a Small Mind:


If you'd like your site to be a future LAMB of the Week, hit me up via email and I'll add you to the queue.




If you're interested, you too can be a LAMBcaster - we love new blood! For more information on the LAMBcast, check out the topic at the LAMB Forums. Music provided royalty-free by Kevin MacLeod's Incompetech website. Big thanks to Kevin for providing this service. The LAMBcast loves feedback, too. Either here in the comments section or to blogcabins@yahoo.com or to our Facebook page. Also, we're on iTunes, and would still love a review, even if it's a bad one.

Thanks for listening!

PLUG: Marshall and the Movies

Hello fellow moviegoers!

It's a new year, and most people have resolutions. One of my primary ones is to enhance my connection with the community of moviegoers with my Facebook page. It provides a great medium to share opinions and interact together, be you a movie blogger or a casual Netflix surfer.

What better way to get the community motivated than through a contest? For the first two weeks of January, to get the page running at full speed and to encourage participation, fans will have the opportunity to win "The Social Network" on DVD or digital download.

But Rome wasn't built in a day, and I'm going to start simple to engage the community. The contest is going to try to breathe some life into the discussion boards here on the Facebook page.

Here's how it works:

You can earn 1 point for replying to a discussion topic previously posted. I've started a few to get the conversation started.
You can earn 2 points for starting your own topic.
I look forward to seeing how we can connect through movies (and Facebook) together!

-Marshall


Got a Press Release, something to Plug, or a Screener available for review (or some combination of the three)? Ok, don't get all crazy about it. Just click here and give me the details (what, when, where, and a link, for starters) - I'll handle the rest.

LAMBcast #43: The Social Network

Note: We need more guinea pigs for our LAMB of the Week segment! If you're up for an audio Blustering of your site, leave a comment here or shoot an email to blogcabins@yahoo.com.

Note 2: Potential noobs, we still want you! Got a mic and a desire to plug your site and just maybe get to know a few other awesome LAMBs? Go the the Forums, sign up for an upcoming show, and all your wildest dreams will come true.

Note 3: Your wildest dreams will not, in fact, come true. That was crazy hyperbole.


The long-awaited episode 43 has landed! We're almost back on schedule here, as episode 45 ought to be up sometime around Wednesday. In the meantime, host Jason is joined by James, Marshall and LAMBcast noob Univarn as they break down The Social Network. Yay, I made it through that without using a "Like" pun or anything like that. Also on tap:

* Listener Feedback
* LAMB of the Week: The Dark of the Matinee
* Trailer Talk: And Soon the Darkness
* Remember the Times

For the LAMB of the Week, we take a look at LAMB #120, The Dark of the Matinee:


If you'd like your site to be a future LAMB of the Week, hit me up via email and I'll add you to the queue.




If you're interested, you too can be a LAMBcaster - we love new blood! For more information on the LAMBcast, check out the topic at the LAMB Forums. Music provided royalty-free by Kevin MacLeod's Incompetech website. Big thanks to Kevin for providing this service. The LAMBcast loves feedback, too. Either here in the comments section or to blogcabins@yahoo.com or to our Facebook page. Also, we're on iTunes, and would still love a review, even if it's a bad one.

Thanks for listening!

Interview with a LAMBpire: Marshall and the Movies

This is Andrew from Encore's World of Film & TV. You may have noticed that I've been unusually late with the results for the last LAMB Casting episode, but that just seems you can cast votes if you haven't already (HERE). I've been thinking of ways to make the series more interesting, and decided that resuscitating an old favourite feature of mine to exist in accordance with LAMB Casting: Interview with the LAMBpire. Winners of each LAMB Casting gets an interview, and I've started with the most recent winner, Marshall of Marshall and the Movies who won for his recasting of Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf
     
Andrew: Who is your favourite director? Why?
         
Marshall: That is tough. I love all of Martin Scorsese’s movies, and The Departed may be my favorite movie ever, but I’m going to have to say that my favorite director is Jason Reitman. After only three movies, he has proven himself capable of making incredible resonant movies, and I can’t wait to see what’s coming.
Andrew: Which Reiteman film are you most fond of?
           
Marshall: Up in the Air, that's easy. It is so deep on so many different levels. There's the whole technology and alienation theme, which is powerful. Yet at its core, the movie is about finding purpose and meaning in life - something anyone can relate to.
            
Andrew: Do you agree with the auteur theory (which posits that the director is the biggest creative force behind a film)?
                  
Marshall: I do agree to a certain extent; I definitely refer to the director as if the movie belongs to them when I review of a movie. If a director is truly passionate about his film, then they are going to involve themselves in all parts of the production. Most of the directors who find awards recognition in the winter are people who do just that.
                       
Andrew: Which directors best embody this theory for you?
         
Marshall: Probably Quentin Tarantino, if only because he jumps up and down wildly with enthusiasm for his movies as if he were nine years old.
                   
Andrew: Annette Bening was one of the actors you chose for your winning LAMB Casting Entry. Is there any type of role you’d like to Annette tackle that she hasn’t so far?
                    
Marshall: Really raunchy comedy – The Kids Are All Right doesn’t count because she in essence played Carolyn Burnham from American Beauty. It should be something tasteful (I’m not telling her to star in the latest spoof from two of the six writers of Scary Movie), but something that is going to shock us. We should still think that she’s giving a great performance; however, I’d also love us to think, “THAT is the woman from American Beauty? Wow.”
Andrew: What would you say about Annette in The Grifters or perhaps Running with Scissors? Warren Beatty considers the latter hest best performance.
           
Marshall: I'm a bad fan ... I haven't seen her in either.

Andrew: How important you think casting is in film? Does the actor make the role or vice versa?
                            
Marshall: I think casting is extremely important. They have to be capable of taking the character from the page and breathing life into those words. We’ve all seen many great characters ruined by bad actors (cough, Diego Luna in Milk), and we’ve seen many great actors ruined by bad characters. But the latter is the actor’s fault, not the casting director’s.
                     
Andrew: Do you think there should be an Oscar category for casting directors?
           
Marshall: It would be sweet if the Oscars added an ensemble category and maybe gave the casting directors the Oscar for that. But there would be a massive outcry if the actors didn't get them as well. I don't know if simply being in a well-acted movie qualifies anyone in that movie to receive an Oscar.
                    
Andrew: Gun to your head: you can only pick films from 1978 and earlier or 1979 onto now. Which would you pick? Why?
                
Marshall: I’d have to take the movies from the post-1979 world if only because I have the nostalgia factor of those that I saw in theaters. Although most of the movies I’ve seen have been from 1979 on, so being stuck with the 1978 and earlier wouldn’t be too bad because of all the new movies I could watch.
              
Andrew: You’re a seventeen year old student; how difficult is it keeping up the blog?
                                
Marshall: It’s very tough, especially during the school year. I try to work on writing pieces whenever I have free time, but I have a lot of homework and activities that have to come first. I have started to learn the beauty of having a big archive of posts that I can just publish whenever I don’t have much time for the blog, and that has really helped relieve the pressure. But even with all the stress, I still wouldn’t give up blogging for some extra sleep.
                     
Andrew: Do your schoolmates or family members read your blog?
                     
Marshall: My dad is one of my four email subscribers, which is both good and bad; various other family members read as well. As for friends at school, there are some of them that read. I have a few die-hard readers, and then I’ll get the occasional Facebook message from someone who read a review or a post and had something to comment.
                  
Andrew: Do you see films predominantly as art or entertainment?
            
Marshall: I’d say entertainment. At the very basic level, a good movie needs to engage us, either through pleasing our eyes or giving our brain something to chew on. “Entertainment” has come to be associated with mindless spectacle in the blockbuster era, but I definitely find myself entertained by movies that don’t fit that bill.
         
Andrew: Put together a film of your own – director, actors, writers (cinematographer, editor, set designer, costume designer, scorer) and a short plot if you wish.
                
Marshall: The Dark Knight Returns – the dream team from the last movie, Nolan, Pfister, Zimmer, etc. plus Bale, Caine, Freeman, and Oldman. New characters include Michael Emerson (Ben from Lost) as The Riddler, Philip Seymour Hoffman as The Penguin, and Marion Cotillard as Vicki Vale.

Andrew: I've noticed more than a few people going crazy for Marion Cotillard lately. What is it about her that makes you a fan?
            
Marshall: She's stunningly beautiful AND she can act. Her performance in La Vie en Rose is easily one of the greatest of all-time, a hyperbole I have no reservations about using. Public Enemies and Nine would have been great mainstream breakout roles for her had either of those movies been any good, but it looks like Inception is finally going to do it for her.
     
What are your thoughts on Reitman, Cotillard, casting and movies?

LAMBcast #26

FYI: I started a dedicated Facebook page for the LAMBcast. I'll still post something here when a new episode is released, but if you're looking for a central place for commentary, suggestions, complaints, etc., go here (and LIKE it!).

What makes a good comedy? What makes one flop? What makes P.uff(y) D(a)iddy funny? What kind of future lies in store for Russell Brand, and just who in the hell was that hilarious young lady playing his ex-wife in Get Him to the Greek?

A review of GHTTG, along with all these questions and more are answered (or not) in the latest episode of the LAMBcast, which thankfully went off without a hitch. On hand for the silliness was: Nick, Marshall, a new noob in the form of Sebastian Gutierrez of Detailed Criticisms, and myself.




If you're interested, you too can be a LAMBcaster - we love new blood! For more information on the LAMBcast, check out the topic at the LAMB Forums.

As usual, the music, as provided royalty-free by Kevin MacLeod's Incompetech website, is the bomb. Big thanks to Kevin for providing this service.

Also, we're still on iTunes, and would still love a review, even if it's a bad one. Thanks for listening!

LAMB Casting Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf: The Results

I am late with this so humble apologies, but on to this episode of LAMB Casting, this time focusing on the Mike Nichols' classic Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf. I am Andrew from Encore's World of Film & TV and these are your results.
I will say, the casting has been going on for some months but this is the first time now single cast stood out as my favourite. Each of them had something going for them...here were the choices...
Jess from Insight Into Entertainment chose the following foursome:
What I like about this is how logical it all is. I can't be the only one getting an older Elizabeth Taylor vibe from Stockhard Channing, am I? The banter between she and Alan would be excellent, and for someone so typecast as a monotonous villain it would be lovely seeing Rickman bite into this nuanced role. Ryan Reynolds and Amy Adams as the young couple is another good choice. Both have the good-looks without looking too...exotic, and Nick and Honey should look "safe" so it really does work. I do feel Ryan has talent to spare, so it would be nice getting to see him push himself. My Favourite: Stockhard Channing
CS from Big Thoughts From A Small Mind (and fellow Lamb contributor) submitted these:
CS always thinks outside of the box, and once again he does so. Catherine Keener is known for comedic talents, but she can be a cold hard bitch whe necessary, she would be decidedly mean as Martha and Dylan Baker looks soft, but could just as mean which is just what is needed from George. John Cho as Nick as interesting choice, and he is the sort of "nice-looking" guy that could seem just a bit boring, and Robin Tuney has precisely the bewildered sort of look I'd attribute to Honey, I'd buy her and Cho as a couple too. My Favourite: Robin Tuney
Clarabela from Just Chick Flicks chooses this quartet:
She brings in theatre stalwarts known for their film with Philip Seymour Hoffman and Viola Davis. I really like this pairing, Davis does not get enough work and she's due for a lead role. The caustic Martha would make any good woman's career, and though Hoffman does not strike you as the usual George the man is surely talented enough to pull it off. Ryan Phillippe is so hated - I don't know why. He impressed me particulalry in Gosford Park and if he were to play Nick in that same register I'd probably love it, too and pairing him with Scarlett would be sensational. Even though she is known for her good looks I'd like to see her play in to the tics of Honey...and she is a Tony Winner now. My Favourite: Ryan Phillippe
Marshall from Marshall and Movies identifies these:
Marshall's cast is the most Hollywood, and that is a compliment. I can see this one being made and the casting of Ms. Bening is largely responsible for that. From Carolyn Burnham to Julia Lambert to Deidre Burroughs how could I not think she can handle this? I'll admit George Clooney does nothing for me, and though I'm somewhat sceptic of his ability to succeed Richard Burton he would probably surpise me. It would be interesting see good-boy Jake playing Nick, but it is the sort of role he could make work and his pairing would Amy Adams would be believable (who gets chosen once again). My Favourite: Annette Bening
Walter from The Silver Screening Room identifies four he's very ecstatic about:
...and I am too. It's probably the most subtle of the choices, but it makes sense when you think. Marcia Gay Harden is talented (so says her Oscar and Tony) but she's often forgotten. She didn't cross my mind when I thought of Martha but she would obviously be able to do this wonderfully and Bruce Greenwood is someone I never remember but his ability to be forgotten is just what would make him an excellent George. Reynolds gets noticed once again...and then, there is Ms. Garai. I've been singing my praised for her work in Atonement for three years and Honey would be an excellent piece for her to tackle. My Favourite: Romola Garai
Jude from ...And All That Film offers these four:
It's one of the atypical choices, because of the youth, but it's a good one. Lisa Kudrow is known for her comedic talents so obviously we do not think of her for a drama. But Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf is no straight drama, it's a dark and macabre comedy and Lisa's ability to steal the show is just perfect. Jude may be young, but he is a favourite of mine and his ability to be so mean at times (think of The Talented Mr. Ripley) would be what we'd want from George. Ewan may be a little old for Nick, but can anyone deny that he has the right affability for the role...and Christina Ricci is the sort of actress who can go subtle then go crazy that would work perfectly as Honey. My Favourite: Jude Law
Overall I'd say the casting of the Martha's are my favourite. Each caster did excellently there. There were some choices I'd expected that did not turn up though, like Rupert Friend or James Franco (for Nick) or Dianne Wiest or Emma Thompson or Laura Linney (all for Martha) Ralph Fiennes or Ed Harris (for George) or Kirsten Dunst or Winona Ryder (for Honey)...but you're probably wondering, why the hell am I rambling. So I'll cease and get on with the results, it was a close race for first and it came down to Marshall and Jess nd the winner was
Marshall of Marshall and the Movies by just two votes! I guess you all loved his Hollywood cast of Annette, George, Jake and Amy.
Thanks to all the casters for turning in excellent choices, I'll put up the new movie for casting later in the week.
...but tell me what you think of the results, which casts were you gunning for...and would you pay to see Marshall's movie. I would!

LAMBcast #25 (the short version)

If there's one thing I've learned over the course of 25 podcasts, it's how to deal with new obstacles that get in the way of producing a good show. I realize that unlike most other podcasts which consist of either a couple people in the same room or maybe a conversation between two people in different locations, we've always had our degree of difficulty set a few notches higher. With podcasters coming from all over the world, and upwards of five people all in separate locations, it's bound to get tricky and unpredictable.

All of this is another way of saying that we had some audio issues this time out. For that reason, the full episode will not be published, but for posterity's sake, and hopefully for your enjoyment, I'm putting out the two games of Last LAMB Standing that were played. On hand was Nick, Marshall, the Cin-Obs, Chantal and Angie, and myself. Stay tuned next week for a full, error-free ep.

(Note: it may take some time for this episode to show up in the embedded player below: click here if it's not yet there.)




If you're interested, you too can be a LAMBcaster - we love new blood! For more information on the LAMBcast, check out the topic at the LAMB Forums.

As usual, the music, as provided royalty-free by Kevin MacLeod's Incompetech website, is the bomb. Big thanks to Kevin for providing this service.

Also, we're still on iTunes, and would still love a review, even if it's a bad one. Thanks for listening!

LAMBcast #24

With the release of Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time, we take it upon ourselves to look back on the (surprisingly short) history of video game movies, in all their glory (or lack thereof).

Here are some clues as to the array of topics discussed:

* Minesweeper: The Movie

* The Legend of Zelda trailer



On hand were host Dylan Fields, along with Nick Jobe, Jason Soto, and a newbie to the LAMBcast, Marshall of Marshall and the Movies. And as usual, that is all followed up with some LLS and Trailer Talk.

(Note: it may take some time for this episode to show up in the embedded player below: click here if it's not yet there.)




If you're interested, you too can be a LAMBcaster - we love new blood! For more information on the LAMBcast, check out the topic at the LAMB Forums.

As usual, the music, as provided royalty-free by Kevin MacLeod's Incompetech website, is the bomb. Big thanks to Kevin for providing this service.

Also, we're still on iTunes, and would still love a review, even if it's a bad one. Thanks for listening!

For Your Consideration: Marshall and the Movies, The Tinseltown Review, MovieMania, and Life of a Cinephile and Bibliophile

Hey you! Send me an FYC image and I will put it up! I don't care if I get one from 50 60 sites, I'll find a way to get them all up, and as soon as possible (the nomination voting period only lasts until May 12th!). When you're ready to vote, do it here: http://www.misterpoll.com/polls/482056

(click images to enlarge)

FYC #46 is for LAMB #395, Marshall and the Movies.



FYC #47 is for LAMB #503, The Tinseltown Review.



FYC #48 is for LAMB #456, MovieMania.



FYC #49 is for LAMB #408, Life of a Cinephile and Bibliophile.

PLUG: Marshall and the Movies' Comment Contest


The prize: The winner's choice of a 2009 Best Picture nominee.
The catch: Each comment left on my blog will give that person one entry. The winner will be chosen at random.

Improving your odds:

Fellow bloggers, if you post a link to this contest on your own blog, I will give you two extra entries.

Non-bloggers and other friends, if you refer a first-time commenter to Marshall and the Movies and they mention you by name, I will give you three extra entries.

For more info on the contest, go here.

Got a Press Release, something to Plug, or a Screener available for review (or some combination of the three)? Ok, well don't get all crazy about it. Just click here and give me the details - I'll handle the rest.

Brutally Blunt Blog Blustering #31: Marshall and the Movies

It's Blusterin' Time (again)!

And remember: Blustering should be a two-way street; if you've asked to be blustered, you better be a blusterer.

If you're new to this feature or need a refresher, click the label at the bottom of this post and see the first few posts. Otherwise, here's the basics:

What I'll do is list a site; you're asked to critique it. But here's the catch: to induce the most honest reactions, don't leave the comment using your normal alias/login - instead, go anonymou
s, and be as brutally honest (or complimentary) as you wish to be. Also, be specific, and naturally, don't be rude. If I deem anything inappropriate, I'll have no problem deleting the comment.

So, go to the site listed below, familiarize yourself with it for a few minutes, then come back and leave some constructive criticism and/or comments that you have.

Site: Marshall and the Movies
LAMB#: 395
URL:
http://marshallandthemovies.com/













If you're up for this treatment for your site (and you're a LAMB), send me an email with the subject "Bluster Me!" If you've already done so, no need to do it again - you're on the list, and these will be going up in order of when I received your email (by the way, it could take a while for your site to be Blustered, since I don't run this more than once a week or so).

LAMB #395 - Marshall and the Movies













URL: http://marshallandthemovies.com/
Site Name: Marshall and the Movies
Categories: Reviews, Editorials, and a new category....Oscars/Awards Season
Rating: PG

What is the main focus of your site?
The main focus of my blog is to expose the community to movies or aspects of movies that they might not see at first glance.

What are your blogging goals, personally and/or professionally? In other words, what, if anything, are you trying to get out your blog?
As I wrote in my first blog post, the goals of my blog are to "to inspire a deeper appreciation of movies, foster a desire to discuss movies, and connect with people through the glorious medium of film." But as time has passed, I have begun to use my blog to discover why movies are important to me and to find the root of my obsession with movies.

Do you prefer an interactive community for your blog or are you the teacher and your readers the students?
I prefer an interactive community, but in order to have one, I need more readers to comment! I have a few who comment frequently, but I need a much greater number to comment so that I do not become a teacher and my readers students.

How long have you been movie blogging for, and how frequent do you post updates to your site?
I have been blogging for three months (the minimum amount of time it takes to be featured here), and I have loved every minute of it. I post a "Random Factoid" about myself every day, which gives some obscure insight into my love of movies. I highlight a lesser-known movie every Friday, which I call the "F.I.L.M. of the Week;" F.I.L.M. stands for "First-Rate, Independent Little-Known Movie." And on occasion, reviews and columns will pop up whenever I have time to complete them.

Name up to three of your favorite movies (and no more).
Being limited to three favorite movies is tough. Soon, I will embark on what I call the Top 10 project, in which will analyze my favorite 10 movies, put them in order of preference, and get to the core of what really makes a movie great. But if I have to choose now, my three favorite movies are The Departed, American Beauty, and The Dark Knight.

How did you hear about the LAMB?
I heard about LAMB through a link on a blog that I frequently read, M. Carter at the Movies.

Any additional comments, or give yourself an interview question that's not listed above.
Other questions/things to know:

* I am 17 years old and out to prove that my generation is not going to lead cinema into a dark age.
* I am COMPLETELY obsessed with movies.

To quote Casablanca, I think this is the beginning of a beautiful friendship. Confession: That's what Rotten Tomatoes told me when I joined the community. That's the only way I know it.